A simple open vs closed tale
Science in the Sands reports how a US Professor, Dianne O'Leary, wrote to the publisher, Springer, asking for a PDF of her own paper. They refused and as her university doesn't subscribe to the journal, because it is prohibitively expensive, she couldn't get a final copy of her own article.
A later update reveals that, she could get the copy, but you have to ask the right person. This is something I have often encountered – getting the definitive copy, as quite often the last version you hold on your machine is not one that has been through final edits. So even when she could get the copy, it took a long time to obtain it, you had to find the right person to ask, and it often comes with limitations on use (such as you can't post it on a website).
Now, contrast this with a recent experience I had with my Digital Scholar book, which is published by Bloomsbury under a Creative Commons license. I realised the other day that I too, didn't have a PDF version of the final book. The version they make available is in HTML. I knew that the book torrent site Library Pirate had made a version available. As it is a non-commercial license, this is perfectly legitimate (I think). So I went to their site and downloaded a 'pirate' version of my own book. Within minutes I had a PDF (Download TheDigitalScholar), which I could do with as I wish.
As an author, which process is preferable?
I downloaded a PDF of your book via a #Change11 link, so I could read it on my iPad
It is not even funny – author who can get the PDF copy of his own book only via the “pirate” torrent site. Have you asked your publisher about PDF version?
@Ronny – I didn’t mean to disparage my publisher, they’ve been great (they released it under a CC license after all). I didn’t ask them for a copy to be honest, I’m sure they’d have given me one. It was just quicker to go to LibraryPirate – and that is one of the advantages of it being open in the first place.
Open, open, open.
I still can’t believe we pay to work when it comes to academic publications. that’s how I feel. I review papers for free, I write papers for free (still haven’t managed to write a book – still fighting to finish a dissertation 🙂 – and then potential readers are asked to pay to have access to it. I will be too when my institution doesn’t subscribe to it.
A bit ridiculous. I have never this kind of business model anywhere else!!!
BTW – I had the option not to buy your book (as I could have downloaded it) but I did. I love books. So that was one reason. The fact that you made it available online for free made me want to buy it even more! Respect. Thanks for setting the example. I shall follow you as I am committed to go the open access route.