Proctorio sponsor OEB, so it’s a no from me
Online Educa in Berlin is one of the biggest ed tech conference in Europe. I’ve been a couple of times and was going to attend this year, mainly for the gluhwein. But I see on their website that proctoring company Proctorio is now their platinum sponsor.
I genuinely appreciate that running conferences is a difficult balancing act, made even more precarious in post-pandemic times when travel is still uncertain for many. Getting sponsors for a conference is often the difference between it being feasible and not. But equally, one must ask, what would it take for a sponsor to be deemed unsuitable? And for me, Proctorio are some way over that line.
This is not because they are a proctoring company – I have reservations about proctoring, but I know that in some cases they may be required, and not all proctoring methods are the same (for instance, UniWise seems less intrusive). Others I know will take a stronger stance on this and reject all proctoring, and I respect that. But personally, if another proctoring company was sponsoring I might hold my nose and attend.
But the difference with this particular proctoring company is their, in my view, aggressive legal stance towards criticism. They are currently suing a student and their protracted case against Ian Linkletter. As I’ve argued before, these are actions which I see as antithetical to core values of higher education. For any conference that aims to be serving the needs of those operating in higher ed, giving a platform and legitimacy to such a company undermines their validity.
There are people I admire on the OEB speaker list, and many of these will have signed up prior to Proctorio being announced as the key sponsor. The reasons people have for attending a conference are varied and I wouldn’t want to argue that no-one should attend, but I don’t feel comfortable going and it’s a question you might ask yourself too. I guess it’s homemade gluhwein this year then.
[Update: I noticed that the theme of the conference is “Learning Resilience”. I would argue that one form resilience could take is for higher ed not to be forced to align with companies it finds unethical in order to fund conferences. A second form of resilience might be redesigning assessment and education so that intrusive proctoring is not required.]
5 Comments
Ken Bauer
I stand with you on this and am now paying attention to the sponsor list of events I plan to attend or submit to.
I didn’t pay attention to that at all in the past.
Wayne Holmes
“A second form of resilience might be redesigning assessment and education so that intrusive proctoring is not required.” I’d raise a glass of gluhwein to see that!
Irwin DeVries
With you on this.
Dr. Sarah Elaine Eaton
Thank you for taking a stand.
Uli Trodler
Absolutely! Was shocked when I first heard about proctoring and its intrusiveness.
Also, will bear in mind looking at sponsors, thank you, Martin.
Pity about the Glühwein though 😉
But then again, the basics: red wine, a few slices of orange, star anise, cinammon stick, cloves, sugar – enjoy.