VLE

Things I was wrong about pt2: The Death of the VLE

I expect Tom Farrelly and my Irish ed tech friends will have a chuckle at this one as the people at ILTA once published a special issue on how the VLE is Not Dead. It was basically a gentle academic roast. It was deserved because in 2007 (!), I foolishly declared, “The VLE is dead”, because I was all excited by the prospect of loosely coupled tools, PLEs and EduGlu. This post is as much as why I was wrong about them taking off as I was about the persistence of the VLE. There was a lively debate on “the VLE is dead” at the 2009 annual ALT-C so I wasn’t the only one.

This has patently not come to pass, and as McAvinia and Risquez (2018) conclude in the ILTA editorial that far from fading, the VLE has evolved:

The newer VLEs and upgrades of the “traditional” brands offer features such as integrated social media tools and e-portfolios, and have lost the visual cues tying them to the classroom, such as book and blackboard imagery. The regeneration of the VLE is remarkable. (p. ii)

There are two elements to why I face-planted so spectacularly on this one – the failure of VLE alternatives, and the reasons beyond the VLE’s persistence. To take the alternatives first, I think during the late 00s we were all still caught up in web 2.0 fever, and let’s face it, naive about the robustness of third party tools (I say “we” but that was probably just me). The third-party tools I listed in my “VLE is Dead” post (e.g., Wetpaint, Pageflakes, Jaiku) have largely all disappeared. And even when they don’t, we now know they tend towards enshittification pretty quickly. So constructing learning environments from these is a really bad idea generally (imagine if you’d integrated Twitter deeply into your learning environment). But there are other options, open sourced ones or more user owned ones. Let’s face it I’ll be on my deathbed insisting blogs are the learning tool you really need, but I know that boat has sailed. Also it transpired that constructing loosely coupled, personal architectures was more complex (both technically and cognitively) than we envisaged. The focus moved away from the tools to the people and resources, so we saw a shift from PLE to PLN.

But that doesn’t quite answer why the LMS is still going strong. Partly their continued success is down to simple inertia and the kind of software sedimentation we see with enterprise systems. Integration with highly complex university admin systems is not something to take lightly. But they also benefit from the “good enough” principle – we have become accustomed to them and now that they are in place, new developments become incorporated into them such as embeds, assessment, lecture capture, social media, etc. MOOCs saw a flurry of platforms but these have either morphed into VLEs of their own or faded away. And of course, we are now seeing the advent of AI related VLEs. Whether this will see a shake-up in the VLE market or a simple amoebic like absorption into existing system remains to be seen.

Interestingly, when Covid hit the VLEs didn’t quiet take their moment in the spotlight as one might have anticipated, and instead there was a shift to Zoom and Teams. The inability to see beyond the online lecture meant that the VLE wasn’t well suited to this sudden shift. Rather depressingly, a VLE-centric online course might actually be at the more radical end of online offerings now.

So, I was wrong partly through naivety about the alternative, but also because of the increasingly conservative ways in which online learning was conceived. I’m taking half of a hit in this one, wrong but for some of the right reasons.

13 Comments

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

css.php